Wednesday 5 August 2015

Russia might be covering their liabilities to the former shareholders of Yukos by selling its properties outside federation - also those in Warsaw

No comments :


The newspaper RBC calculated the amount of the liabilities that the Russian state has to pay to the former shareholders of Yukos, which has been illegally nationalized at the beginning of 2000s.



In 2013, Russia was ordered to pay a compensation for the bankruptcy of the company and the sale of its assets in 2004, to the former shareholders of Yukos. The amount is essentially compensation for the bankruptcy of the company by Russian authorities and the sale of its assets in 2004. The panel of judges of The Hague Tribunal back then ruled that Russia had violated the Energy Charter Treaty when it de facto expropriated the oil company from its legitimate owners by putting the oil company Yuganskneftegaz, a key asset of Yukos, under the control of state oil major Rosneft (based on The Telegraph).

According to the RBC newspaper, liabilities amount to a total of $ 5 billion. French and Belgian bailiffs have already started seizing assets of the Russian Federation in response to the judgment of the Court of Justice in The Hague July 18. The lawyer representing a group of former shareholders of Yukos, Tim Osborne, argues that it will be applied to study Russian assets located in 150 countries. That's why the Russians count with the possibility of further activities funds abroad.

Besides Russia there are about 973 objects that can be seized. Their value is estimated at around 4 billion euros.

As points out Wojciech Jakobik for Onet.pl, the objects that would be of an interest of eventual sell-off, in the first place will be the buildings with Russian Federation’s ownership but without diplomatic status. That means, those would be residential and commercial buildings, as well as constructions of a religious importance. Russia has quite a few buildings on this type in Warsaw.

Under the agreements signed between Poland and Russian Federation in 1970s, Poland handed over a number of buildings on attractive plots near the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. So far, their status is not regulated, even though it has been communicated multiple times by experts that such state of things can cause disputes in the future. According to TVN, the Russian Federation does not pay taxes on these properties.

Furthermore, there are ongoing speculation about inappropriate use of those properties to achieve the political objectives of Moscow, such as eavesdropping of operations of key state institutions of Poland – keeping in mind location of these buildings, it could be a good point of such actions.


Jukos Case:  the history

Yukos, like most of the largest Russian oil companies, was founded in 1993. According to the contemporary concept of restructuring the oil industry of Russia, were to arise four independent from each other companies extracting and processing oil: Rosneft, Lukoil, Surgutneftegaz and Yukos that control both the deposits of raw material and oil refineries. Yukos became the first fully private Russian oil company. Over the next few years, Yukos underwent a complete restructuring and began to bear huge profits.
Over the course of a decade, thanks to the excellent administrative personnel ( invited to work in the Western manner, from Western European countries and the United States), Yukos started to be considered to be the most transparent of the Russian corporations, which undoubtedly resulted from its clear, carefully planned management strategy. Such perception of a company have been observed in Russia, as well as in the West.

At the time when Vladimir Putin has taken the President’s position, Yukos was in a very good financial situation. The company had been present on the international stock markets (for example in New York, London and Munich) as well as had started to intensively invest in international projects (for example in Slovakia, Lithuania or China).
“Yukos Scandal” has started from outspoken, critical discussion between Vladimir Putin and the main stakeholder of a company, Mikhail Khodorkovsky. Khodorkovsky repeatedly criticized Kremlin’s politics and their way of governing, which created favourable environment for corruption as well as limited possibilities of construction of a private pipeline. The millionaire was very persistent with his opinion and started to actively support political opposition (based on: Rosjapl.info).

At the time, public opinion did not see mismatch in Khodorkovsky’s engaging the business community in political affairs. In 2003, shortly before the upcoming parliamentary elections, the head of Yukos has financially supported three parties (opposition to Kremlin’s delegation): Union of Right Forces, Yabloko and the Communists, hoping to create in the parliament significant counterweight to the presidential’ party. Even though Khodorkovsky never expressed his willingness to be active politician, he generated the atmosphere of ambiguity (mojeopinie.pl).

Mikhail Khodorkovsky was arrested in October 2003. He is soon convicted for alleged tax evasion and financial fraud. Regardless of the actual scale of irregularities, the process claimed the defendant guilty before it has even started. In 2006, the court announced the bankruptcy of Yukos. The company's assets largely took over the state-owned energy giant Rosneft. Khodorkovsky himself was sentenced to 8 years of forced labour at a penal colony.



Conclusion

As Institute for the Eastern Studies points out in their analysis, Yukos Case had brought new “colours” to the Russian political scene. After the "plebiscite" presidential election in March 2004, Vladimir Putin finally became a dominant player on the political scene, strengthened its independence from the elite and gained greater social support. Elected in 2000 the strong president, but never before recognized as charismatic character, now was replaced by a president dominating the entire system. This significantly limited pluralism in the Russian political scene.  

International environment perceives politics of Kremlin’s negatively, but it does not seem to stop Putin from emphasizing his dominance. Even in the light of, pretty big, liabilities that the Russian state to pay to the former shareholders of Yukos, Kremlin seems to be very defensive and convinced of their invincibility.






The article was written thanks to information found on:








Picture:

Khodorkovsky, at the background with the logo of Yukos:


http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/BC0F/production/_83734184_khodnewindexafp.jpg

No comments :

Post a Comment

This blog is a place where people show each other respect and discuss in reverent manner. Please, keep that in mind while posting your comment